RetroPie forum home
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Home
    • Docs
    • Register
    • Login
    Please do not post a support request without first reading and following the advice in https://retropie.org.uk/forum/topic/3/read-this-first

    Retroarch no longer builds successfully during update (Ubuntu 18.04.3)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Help and Support
    retroarchubuntubuild failed
    32 Posts 4 Posters 2.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • mituM
      mitu Global Moderator @movisman
      last edited by

      @movisman said in Retroarch no longer builds successfully during update (Ubuntu 18.04.3):

      I did spot this:
      https://github.com/libretro/RetroArch/issues/9583

      Yes, that's the cause of the issue - it's a RetroArch bug.

      Similar error, but it looks like it was resolved here for the Retropie build:
      https://github.com/RetroPie/RetroPie-Setup/pull/2941

      It looks like it's not, since you cannot install it ?
      On non-X11 systems, the solution was to disable Wayland when building RetroArch, but on PC systems, that may be necessary - so it's left there.

      The strange thing is that I don't get this error and didn't happen during testing. What version of sdl2 do you have installed ? Can you run

      apt show libsdl2-2.0.0
      

      and post the output ?

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        movisman @mitu
        last edited by movisman

        Indeed, it absolutely refuses to build on this box, but was fine previously of course. Retroarch is still on 1.7.6 at the moment. I have updated all other packages with no issue.

        What version of sdl2 do you have installed ? Can you run

        apt show libsdl2-2.0.0
        

        and post the output ?

        Indeed I can - here you go:

        pi@retropie-pc:~$ apt show libsdl2-2.0.0
        Package: libsdl2-2.0-0
        Version: 2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4
        Priority: optional
        Section: universe/libs
        Source: libsdl2
        Origin: Ubuntu
        Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>
        Original-Maintainer: Debian SDL packages maintainers <pkg-sdl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
        Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
        Installed-Size: 1,292 kB
        Depends: libasound2 (>= 1.0.27), libc6 (>= 2.27), libpulse0 (>= 0.99.1), libsndio6.1 (>= 1.1.0), libwayland-client0 (>= 1.9.91), libwayland-cursor0 (>= 1.0.2), libwayland-egl1-mesa (>= 10.0.2) | libwayland-egl1, libx11-6 (>= 2:1.2.99.901), libxcursor1 (>> 1.1.2), libxext6, libxi6 (>= 2:1.2.99.4), libxinerama1, libxkbcommon0 (>= 0.5.0), libxrandr2 (>= 2:1.2.99.3), libxss1, libxxf86vm1
        Conflicts: libsdl-1.3-0
        Replaces: libsdl-1.3-0
        Homepage: https://www.libsdl.org/
        Task: kubuntu-desktop, kubuntu-full, lubuntu-gtk-desktop, lubuntu-desktop, lubuntu-qt-desktop, ubuntustudio-video, ubuntustudio-graphics, ubuntustudio-audio, ubuntukylin-desktop, ubuntu-budgie-desktop
        Supported: 3y
        Download-Size: 382 kB
        APT-Sources: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/universe amd64 Packages
        Description: Simple DirectMedia Layer
         SDL is a library that allows programs portable low level access to a video
         framebuffer, audio output, mouse, and keyboard.
         .
         This version of SDL is compiled with X11 and Wayland graphics drivers and OSS,
         ALSA, sndio and PulseAudio sound drivers.
        
        N: There are 2 additional records. Please use the '-a' switch to see them.
        

        I haven't messed with SDL so it should be on the 2.0.8 custom build, when I run apt update on this box the SDL packages are held back from updating. If I run an apt list --upgradable I get this:

        libsdl2-2.0-0/bionic-security,bionic-updates 2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4 amd64 [upgradable from: 2.0.8+1]
        libsdl2-dev/bionic-security,bionic-updates 2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4 amd64 [upgradable from: 2.0.8+1]
        

        Let me know what you think.

        Thanks!

        mituM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          movisman
          last edited by

          When I run it with the '-a' switch, I get this additional information, possibly not of any use but here it is anyway:

          Package: libsdl2-2.0-0
          Version: 2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1
          Priority: optional
          Section: universe/libs
          Source: libsdl2
          Origin: Ubuntu
          Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>
          Original-Maintainer: Debian SDL packages maintainers <pkg-sdl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
          Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
          Installed-Size: 1,284 kB
          Depends: libasound2 (>= 1.0.27), libc6 (>= 2.27), libpulse0 (>= 0.99.1), libsndio6.1 (>= 1.1.0), libwayland-client0 (>= 1.9.91), libwayland-cursor0 (>= 1.0.2), libwayland-egl1-mesa (>= 10.0.2) | libwayland-egl1, libx11-6 (>= 2:1.2.99.901), libxcursor1 (>> 1.1.2), libxext6, libxi6 (>= 2:1.2.99.4), libxinerama1, libxkbcommon0 (>= 0.5.0), libxrandr2 (>= 2:1.2.99.3), libxss1, libxxf86vm1
          Conflicts: libsdl-1.3-0
          Replaces: libsdl-1.3-0
          Homepage: https://www.libsdl.org/
          Task: kubuntu-desktop, kubuntu-full, lubuntu-gtk-desktop, lubuntu-desktop, lubuntu-qt-desktop, ubuntustudio-video, ubuntustudio-graphics, ubuntustudio-audio, ubuntukylin-desktop, ubuntu-budgie-desktop
          Supported: 3y
          Download-Size: 378 kB
          APT-Sources: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages
          Description: Simple DirectMedia Layer
           SDL is a library that allows programs portable low level access to a video
           framebuffer, audio output, mouse, and keyboard.
           .
           This version of SDL is compiled with X11 and Wayland graphics drivers and OSS,
           ALSA, sndio and PulseAudio sound drivers.
          
          Package: libsdl2-2.0-0
          Version: 2.0.8+1
          Status: install ok installed
          Priority: optional
          Section: libs
          Source: libsdl2
          Maintainer: Debian SDL packages maintainers <pkg-sdl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
          Installed-Size: 1,182 kB
          Depends: libasound2 (>= 1.0.27), libc6 (>= 2.27), libpulse0 (>= 0.99.1), libsndio6.1 (>= 1.1.0), libx11-6 (>= 2:1.2.99.901), libxcursor1 (>> 1.1.2), libxext6, libxi6 (>= 2:1.2.99.4), libxinerama1, libxrandr2 (>= 2:1.2.99.3), libxss1, libxxf86vm1, libudev0 | libudev1, libdbus-1-3
          Conflicts: libsdl-1.3-0, libsdl2
          Replaces: libsdl-1.3-0, libsdl2
          Homepage: http://www.libsdl.org/
          Download-Size: unknown
          APT-Manual-Installed: yes
          APT-Sources: /var/lib/dpkg/status
          Description: Simple DirectMedia Layer
           SDL is a library that allows programs portable low level access to
           a video framebuffer, audio output, mouse, and keyboard.
           .
           This package contains the shared library, compiled with X11 graphics drivers and OSS, ALSA and PulseAudio sound drivers.
          
          
          
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • mituM
            mitu Global Moderator @movisman
            last edited by

            I have the exact sdl2 version installed. Maybe libsdl2-dev is different ?

            I haven't messed with SDL so it should be on the 2.0.8 custom build, when I run apt update on this box the SDL packages are held back from updating. If I run an apt list --upgradable I get this:
            [..]

            You have the distro version for the packages, just like I have. I don't have anything held, since sdl2 is no longer installed custom on Ubuntu 18.04 (see https://github.com/RetroPie/RetroPie-Setup/pull/2696).

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • mituM
              mitu Global Moderator
              last edited by

              Try un-blocking the sdl2 upgrade, see if they upgrade and check if you don't have a different (than the distro one) version of libsdl2-dev.

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                movisman @mitu
                last edited by

                @mitu

                Here is the libsdl2-dev output for 'apt show':

                pi@retropie-pc:~$ apt show libsdl2-dev
                Package: libsdl2-dev
                Version: 2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4
                Priority: optional
                Section: universe/libdevel
                Source: libsdl2
                Origin: Ubuntu
                Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>
                Original-Maintainer: Debian SDL packages maintainers <pkg-sdl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
                Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
                Installed-Size: 4,321 kB
                Depends: libasound2-dev, libdbus-1-dev, libegl1-mesa-dev, libgl1-mesa-dev, libgles2-mesa-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev, libibus-1.0-dev, libmirclient-dev, libpulse-dev, libsdl2-2.0-0 (= 2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4), libsndio-dev, libudev-dev, libwayland-dev, libx11-dev, libxcursor-dev, libxext-dev, libxi-dev, libxinerama-dev, libxkbcommon-dev, libxrandr-dev, libxss-dev, libxt-dev, libxv-dev, libxxf86vm-dev
                Conflicts: libsdl-1.3-dev
                Replaces: libsdl-1.3-dev
                Homepage: https://www.libsdl.org/
                Supported: 3y
                Download-Size: 683 kB
                APT-Sources: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/universe amd64 Packages
                Description: Simple DirectMedia Layer development files
                 SDL is a library that allows programs portable low level access to a video
                 framebuffer, audio output, mouse, and keyboard.
                 .
                 This package contains the files needed to compile and link programs which
                 use SDL.
                
                N: There are 2 additional records. Please use the '-a' switch to see them.
                
                

                When I first installed this Ubuntu/Retropie instance, I guess SDL was installed custom at the time. Would that explain why it is held back when updating? Should I run a sudo apt-get dist-upgrade to update them?

                I noticed on the sdl2.sh script that the version installed is now 2.0.10, maybe this is irrelevant and i'm barking up the wrong tree there. Just to confirm, on x86 machines does that script no longer do anything if it isn't custom installed on 18.04?

                I found on the forum that Jools suggested you can reinstall SDL from source by using sudo ./retropie_packages.sh sdl2 - however it sounds like from what you are saying it isn't valid on Ubuntu 18.04 as the standard version is used.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  movisman @mitu
                  last edited by

                  @mitu said in Retroarch no longer builds successfully during update (Ubuntu 18.04.3):

                  Try un-blocking the sdl2 upgrade, see if they upgrade and check if you don't have a different (than the distro one) version of libsdl2-dev.

                  Ah, sorry I have just seen this after posting a reply.

                  I will unblock SDL2 now and see what happens...

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    movisman
                    last edited by movisman

                    @mitu

                    Sorry, had to go away and look up unholding commands for apt.... libdsl2-dev was indeed on hold.

                    I unheld that package, did a full apt update/upgrade, it updated those packages and installed some more dependencies. I then tried to reinstall RA again, and it worked! Thanks a lot!

                    So it looks like when I first installed Retropie on this box, SDL was custom installed with Ubuntu, and as a result updates to the package were held back. It was like this ever since I started messing with Retropie in Ubuntu. But when that changed so it was no longer custom installed, my packages remained held back I guess, causing this problem?

                    When I run apt-show with '-a', I now have one less entry than before. The 2.0.8+1 entry has gone since updating (which I think is what used to be installed by Retropie).

                    Just to ask, if you run:

                    apt show libsdl2-2.0.0 -a

                    Do you have two entries? I have two packages for libsdl2-2.0.0, one is version '2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4' and the other is '2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1'.

                    The same applies when I run 'apt show libsdl2-dev -a'.

                    Should I not just have one package for each?

                    In case you are interested, here is the output from my console in terms of unholding the package:

                    The following packages have been kept back:
                      libsdl2-2.0-0 libsdl2-dev
                    0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
                    pi@retropie-pc:~$ apt-mark showhold
                    libsdl2-dev
                    pi@retropie-pc:~$ sudo apt-mark unhold libsdl2-dev
                    Canceled hold on libsdl2-dev.
                    pi@retropie-pc:~$ sudo apt update
                    Hit:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/fengestad/stable/ubuntu bionic InRelease
                    Hit:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease
                    Get:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease [88.7 kB]
                    Hit:4 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-x-swat/updates/ubuntu bionic InRelease
                    Get:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates InRelease [88.7 kB]
                    Fetched 177 kB in 1s (308 kB/s)
                    Reading package lists... Done
                    Building dependency tree
                    Reading state information... Done
                    2 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
                    pi@retropie-pc:~$ sudo apt upgrade
                    Reading package lists... Done
                    Building dependency tree
                    Reading state information... Done
                    Calculating upgrade... Done
                    The following NEW packages will be installed:
                      libcapnp-0.6.1 libmirclient-dev libmirclient9 libmircommon-dev libmircommon7 libmircookie-dev libmircookie2 libmircore-dev libmirco
                      libmirprotobuf3 libprotobuf-dev libprotobuf10 libsndio-dev libxv-dev
                    The following packages will be upgraded:
                      libsdl2-2.0-0 libsdl2-dev
                    2 upgraded, 14 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
                    Need to get 3,913 kB of archives.
                    After this operation, 15.6 MB of additional disk space will be used.
                    Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y
                    Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libcapnp-0.6.1 amd64 0.6.1-1ubuntu1 [658 kB]
                    Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libmircore1 amd64 0.31.1-0ubuntu1 [26.5 kB]
                    Get:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libmircommon7 amd64 0.31.1-0ubuntu1 [73.9 kB]
                    Get:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libmirprotobuf3 amd64 0.31.1-0ubuntu1 [127 kB]
                    Get:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libmirclient9 amd64 0.31.1-0ubuntu1 [199 kB]
                    Get:6 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libmircore-dev amd64 0.31.1-0ubuntu1 [21.7 kB]
                    Get:7 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libprotobuf10 amd64 3.0.0-9.1ubuntu1 [651 kB]
                    Get:8 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libprotobuf-dev amd64 3.0.0-9.1ubuntu1 [959 kB]
                    Get:9 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libmircommon-dev amd64 0.31.1-0ubuntu1 [13.9 kB]
                    Get:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libmircookie2 amd64 0.31.1-0ubuntu1 [19.7 kB]
                    Get:11 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libmircookie-dev amd64 0.31.1-0ubuntu1 [4,392 B]
                    Get:12 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libmirclient-dev amd64 0.31.1-0ubuntu1 [47.8 kB]
                    Get:13 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 libsndio-dev amd64 1.1.0-3 [13.3 kB]
                    Get:14 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 libxv-dev amd64 2:1.0.11-1 [32.5 kB]
                    Get:15 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/universe amd64 libsdl2-dev amd64 2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4 [683 kB]
                    Get:16 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/universe amd64 libsdl2-2.0-0 amd64 2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4 [382 kB]
                    Fetched 3,913 kB in 0s (8,131 kB/s)
                    Selecting previously unselected package libcapnp-0.6.1:amd64.
                    (Reading database ... 165280 files and directories currently installed.)
                    Preparing to unpack .../00-libcapnp-0.6.1_0.6.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libcapnp-0.6.1:amd64 (0.6.1-1ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libmircore1:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../01-libmircore1_0.31.1-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libmircore1:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libmircommon7:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../02-libmircommon7_0.31.1-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libmircommon7:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libmirprotobuf3:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../03-libmirprotobuf3_0.31.1-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libmirprotobuf3:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libmirclient9:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../04-libmirclient9_0.31.1-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libmirclient9:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libmircore-dev:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../05-libmircore-dev_0.31.1-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libmircore-dev:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libprotobuf10:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../06-libprotobuf10_3.0.0-9.1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libprotobuf10:amd64 (3.0.0-9.1ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libprotobuf-dev:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../07-libprotobuf-dev_3.0.0-9.1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libprotobuf-dev:amd64 (3.0.0-9.1ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libmircommon-dev:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../08-libmircommon-dev_0.31.1-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libmircommon-dev:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libmircookie2:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../09-libmircookie2_0.31.1-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libmircookie2:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libmircookie-dev:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../10-libmircookie-dev_0.31.1-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libmircookie-dev:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libmirclient-dev:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../11-libmirclient-dev_0.31.1-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libmirclient-dev:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libsndio-dev:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../12-libsndio-dev_1.1.0-3_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libsndio-dev:amd64 (1.1.0-3) ...
                    Selecting previously unselected package libxv-dev:amd64.
                    Preparing to unpack .../13-libxv-dev_2%3a1.0.11-1_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libxv-dev:amd64 (2:1.0.11-1) ...
                    Preparing to unpack .../14-libsdl2-dev_2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libsdl2-dev:amd64 (2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4) over (2.0.8+1) ...
                    Preparing to unpack .../15-libsdl2-2.0-0_2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4_amd64.deb ...
                    Unpacking libsdl2-2.0-0:amd64 (2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4) over (2.0.8+1) ...
                    Setting up libmircore-dev:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libmirprotobuf3:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libsndio-dev:amd64 (1.1.0-3) ...
                    Setting up libprotobuf10:amd64 (3.0.0-9.1ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libmircookie2:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libsdl2-2.0-0:amd64 (2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4) ...
                    Setting up libxv-dev:amd64 (2:1.0.11-1) ...
                    Setting up libcapnp-0.6.1:amd64 (0.6.1-1ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libmircore1:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libprotobuf-dev:amd64 (3.0.0-9.1ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libmircookie-dev:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libmircommon7:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libmirclient9:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libmircommon-dev:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libmirclient-dev:amd64 (0.31.1-0ubuntu1) ...
                    Setting up libsdl2-dev:amd64 (2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4) ...
                    Processing triggers for man-db (2.8.3-2ubuntu0.1) ...
                    Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.27-3ubuntu1) ...
                    pi@retropie-pc:~$ sudo apt update
                    Hit:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/fengestad/stable/ubuntu bionic InRelease
                    Hit:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease
                    Hit:3 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-x-swat/updates/ubuntu bionic InRelease
                    Get:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease [88.7 kB]
                    Get:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates InRelease [88.7 kB]
                    Fetched 177 kB in 1s (323 kB/s)
                    Reading package lists... Done
                    Building dependency tree
                    Reading state information... Done
                    All packages are up to date.
                    
                    

                    Thanks a lot!

                    mituM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • mituM
                      mitu Global Moderator @movisman
                      last edited by mitu

                      @movisman said in Retroarch no longer builds successfully during update (Ubuntu 18.04.3):

                      Do you have two entries? I have two packages for libsdl2-2.0.0, one is version '2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4' and the other is '2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1'.

                      Yes, I have also 2 entries (unsurprisingly!). If you look carefully, one is from the main repository and one is from the updates repository, that's why there's 2 of them

                      apt show -a libsdl2-2.0-0 | grep -i APT
                      [..]
                      
                      APT-Sources: http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/universe amd64 Packages
                      APT-Sources: http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages
                      
                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • BuZzB
                        BuZz administrators
                        last edited by

                        Maybe you disabled the custom sdl2 (used to be done for pcsx2 also. Check /opt/retropie/configs/all/retropie.cfg if you have an own_sdl2=0 or something

                        To help us help you - please make sure you read the sticky topics before posting - https://retropie.org.uk/forum/topic/3/read-this-first

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          movisman @BuZz
                          last edited by

                          @BuZz said in Retroarch no longer builds successfully during update (Ubuntu 18.04.3):

                          /opt/retropie/configs/all/retropie.cfg

                          Hi,

                          Hope you are good - no I never messed with changing sdl2 back to standard on this Ubuntu build. I don't use pcsx2 either but I remember when I played with this emulator a couple of years back you could disable custom SDL2. I don't have a retropie.cfg.

                          For whatever reason my libsdl2-dev package being held back seemed to be the cause of RA no longer building. I thought these were held back when Retropie used a custom SDL2, but Mitu said this is custom SDL2 is no longer used on Ubuntu. But whenever that change was made, my packages seemed to remain in a held state.

                          After unholding libsdl2-dev and doing a full update, Retroarch now builds without issue.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            movisman @mitu
                            last edited by

                            @mitu said in Retroarch no longer builds successfully during update (Ubuntu 18.04.3):

                            @movisman said in Retroarch no longer builds successfully during update (Ubuntu 18.04.3):

                            Do you have two entries? I have two packages for libsdl2-2.0.0, one is version '2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.4' and the other is '2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1'.

                            Yes, I have also 2 entries (unsurprisingly!). If you look carefully, one is from the main repository and one is from the updates repository, that's why there's 2 of them

                            apt show -a libsdl2-2.0-0 | grep -i APT
                            [..]
                            
                            APT-Sources: http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/universe amd64 Packages
                            APT-Sources: http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages
                            

                            Cheers for clearing that up, I have this build nice and clean and didn't want any duplicate stuff installed. I now realise that this is just a list, displaying one entry from main and the other from updates.

                            Thanks!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              movisman
                              last edited by

                              @BuZz @mitu

                              So just to confirm, everything is working good now (thanks as always for the help), but to clarify about SDL2 - on Ubuntu Server 18.04.3, should this be using any sort of custom SDL by default, or was that since removed for this type of platform? Just to avoid any confusion on my part.

                              If it is not required, everything should be ok for me now since unholding that libsdl2-dev package and allowing it to update from the Ubuntu update repository. RA builds fine now since doing that. Before it looked like I was stuck on 2.0.8+1, which is what Retropie installed when I first installed this Ubuntu instance over a year ago.

                              Cheers!

                              BuZzB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • BuZzB
                                BuZz administrators @movisman
                                last edited by

                                @movisman it's normal that sdl2 is held. We do that in RetroPie to stop an os version overwriting. SDL should be updated when updating retropie and any package that uses sdl2 despite being held. So not sure why it didn't unless you only updated the script and no packages that used sdl2 after.

                                To help us help you - please make sure you read the sticky topics before posting - https://retropie.org.uk/forum/topic/3/read-this-first

                                M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  movisman @BuZz
                                  last edited by

                                  @BuZz

                                  Ah right, so even for x86 on Ubuntu a custom SDL2 is still preferred / default?

                                  The last time I did an update was September 2019 I think, and that would have included the script, all core packages, plus select emulators (I only installed what I needed when setting up originally), but this still includes the common Libretro ones, as well as a few experimental such as Amiga, Libretro GC/Saturn, etc.

                                  The order I did things today was 1) update script, 2) then "all core packages", then 3) emulators one by one, then 4) other stuff like themes, drivers, etc. This has always worked previously.

                                  When I was updating all the core packages today (after updating the script) I noticed a build error for Retroarch. Taking the libsdl2-dev package off hold and updating it resolved that issue.

                                  What's the easiest way to go back to the custom SDL2 build (which looks like it should be 2.0.10 now looking at the sdl2.sh script?)

                                  Thanks as always.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    movisman @BuZz
                                    last edited by movisman

                                    @BuZz

                                    Hmm, i'm wondering if I do have any emulators installed which actually use SDL2. If this is the case, coupled with the fact I do not do a "full update", maybe means the SDL updating part was skipped? I don't know.

                                    The reason I don't do a full update, is often I want to hold back one or two of the arcade emulators to avoid any potential romset breakage, as I only update my romsets once a year or so, at best.

                                    Anyhow, I figured out the custom SDL2 install though via some posts on the forums, so I ran a ./retropie_packages.sh sdl2 and this installed 2.0.10, and also held back libsdl2-dev once again. It also freed up a load of dependencies too which I was able to safely remove.

                                    Earlier in this thread though, @mitu mentioned that X11 was no longer targeted for custom SDL and provided this link:
                                    https://github.com/RetroPie/RetroPie-Setup/pull/2696

                                    Hence why I thought custom SDL was not part of an Ubuntu / X11 instance anymore.

                                    Anyway, to do some testing, after installing the custom SDL back on, I tried to update retroarch and it failed again during build, same error as before.

                                    So I then ran ./retropie_packages.sh sdl2 revert - this then downgraded the packages back to standard.

                                    I then tried to update retroarch again, and this time it worked.

                                    So, for me, retroarch will only build when I have the standard SDL on the system, it does not work with the custom SDL on there. However it used to build fine without having to remove the custom SDL.

                                    Any idea what might be going on?

                                    BuZzB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • BuZzB
                                      BuZz administrators @movisman
                                      last edited by BuZz

                                      @movisman I forgot I disabled it by default :-)

                                      It doesn't work with the custom due to the bug @mitu mentioned - so maybe we can just enable his workaround/fix for x11 but it's a retroarch bug basically.

                                      To help us help you - please make sure you read the sticky topics before posting - https://retropie.org.uk/forum/topic/3/read-this-first

                                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        movisman @BuZz
                                        last edited by

                                        @BuZz

                                        Ah ha! No worries at all.

                                        Maybe my issue stems from the fact that it used to be included, hence why I was held on 2.0.8+1 - but when it changed to no longer be included by default on x11, my package remained held with the custom SDL, which messes up the retroarch build. And it seems using the latest custom SDL Retroarch still doesn't build.

                                        Is there any useful reason at this stage for me to use the custom SDL on x11 / Ubuntu install? Because if necessary, I can restore it now retroarch is up to date. However if you are not including it by default i'm wondering if I need to bother?

                                        @mitu I know this is a retroarch bug, but do you think it is worth putting in a workaround (if you know of one) for those who run the custom SDL on x11, so that Retroarch still builds?

                                        Cheers

                                        mituM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • mituM
                                          mitu Global Moderator @movisman
                                          last edited by

                                          @movisman said in Retroarch no longer builds successfully during update (Ubuntu 18.04.3):

                                          @mitu I know this is a retroarch bug, but do you think it is worth putting in a workaround (if you know of one) for those who run the custom SDL on x11, so that Retroarch still builds?

                                          At this point, I don't think it deserves a workaround. We'll see if it affects more people and then maybe include the RetroArch build patch.

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • M
                                            movisman @mitu
                                            last edited by

                                            @mitu

                                            Fair enough. I guess it's only likely to potentially affect people who had Retropie installed on x11 back when custom SDL was included by default. In this instance it seems the custom package stays on the system in the held state and will never go back to standard on its own, unless you unhold it yourself and let it update. That's what I found anyway. I guess this wouldn't affect loads of people but at least the fix is here on the forum if anyone comes across it.

                                            Do you know what the custom SDL brings and is it useful to use on this platform type? I know you use standard but just wondering. My picade uses the custom SDL of course, as it's running on a Pi 3.

                                            Thanks a lot.

                                            mituM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post

                                            Contributions to the project are always appreciated, so if you would like to support us with a donation you can do so here.

                                            Hosting provided by Mythic-Beasts. See the Hosting Information page for more information.