The best way to filler mame roms

Riverstorm

@haythoo said in The best way to filler mame roms:

@Floob I have noticed that, but I found this way is more accurate

It's only accurate if the source ROMs are 0.139 or close to that version. The older (or newer) the ROM set the more failures you'll encounter when running games due to ROM updates/additions/changes. The only thing you've really accomplished is pulling a subset of 'OK' tested ROMs. You haven't validated the ROMs themselves to well...anything. If they do work it's completely arbitrary and only because they are a 0.139 set or close. The internal ROMs inside each zip archive have significance. Each ROM inside an archive is raw data that is exacted with a CRC check. You're pulling ROMs solely based on a name with complete disregard to zip archive content.

mediamogul

It can be a bit frustrating when the process doesn't appear to be producing results, but there is method behind the madness and there's always the fine folks here on the forums to help with any problems that might come up.

caver01

I like the technique used by @haythoo here to pull tested games out of a set, but the point being made by others here is that a ROM tested OK by name (game.zip) does not guarantee that YOUR copy of the zip file is the correct version that passed the test. This is because the ROM names don't change, even though their contents evolve over time.

You need to ensure you are starting with a complete set that matches the version of the intended emulator/compatibility list. That's where CLRMAMEPRO comes in. In other words, you can't start with the most current ROMset and pull out the ones tested OK from a Mame4All-pi compatibility list and expect that they will work. The ROMset would be incompatible with the chosen emulator, and although some titles might work, it will be hit and miss, and the compatibility list would be invalid.

If the ROM version sets and lists match up, it's a nice way to filter the files.

Riverstorm

@caver01 said in The best way to filler mame roms:

If the ROM version sets and lists match up, it's a nice way to filter the files.

Agreed, I was going to add something to that effect as what he's done would be quite useful when starting with a proper set and the Wiki spreadsheet.

Floob

Yes, matching against filenames can be useful to compare and produce lists.
I like the batch file editor built into Romlister that does that for removing certain game types and clones etc..
https://www.waste.org/~winkles/ROMLister/

Riverstorm

@Floob said in The best way to filler mame roms:

Yes, matching against filenames can be useful to compare and produce lists.
I like the batch file editor built into Romlister that does that for removing certain game types and clones etc..
https://www.waste.org/~winkles/ROMLister/

Thanks Floob, I've never used ROMLister. I think I am going to load it up as it looks to be very handy.

jorgito13

Hello! Can someone share that spreadsheet, since the link is down.

lr-mame2010 COMPATIBILITY LIST

alt text

mahoneyt944

@jorgito13 This is a much newer source for compatibility. https://buildbot.libretro.com/compatibility_lists/

jorgito13

Thanks @mahoneyt944, but the previous form has more data. I can do more detailed filtering.

mahoneyt944

@jorgito13 the problem with the old compatibility table is RetroPie has changed its underlying OS over the years and all the emulators have been updated since it's creation, so it would be safe to say that some of those entries may not be all that accurate anymore. The new table while not as enriched, is auto-generated based on the lastest XML DAT file used by the core. The entries on that list mirror the warning flags assigned internally by the drivers, so it should be some what accurate with the state of those games.

If there is a particular piece of information you want to be added to the new list, or sorting method. I maybe able to update DAT Magic (what builds those lists) to auto-generate some of those features.