Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders"
-
@Riverstorm the reason i asked what you meant by 'frontend' is that some people mean different things (retroarch, mame tab menu, etc) by it, but luckily my assumption you meant emulation station was correct :)
The only point I was trying to make above is that you can use a merged archive which could contain all the ROM files needed to run a parent, clone, bootleg, etc. Then name it accordingly and it will run successfully. The front-end/emulator doesn't care about "extra" files it just needs to contain the correct files the run the game as it's named.
So when I dumped both the US and Japan versions of Donkey Kong 3 into one archive it could run either game completely dependent upon the name as you were saying. Once the front-end passes control to the emulator it is looking for specific ROMs within the archive needed to run that game and in this case the archive contains all the files needed to run multiple versions from the parent down to a bootleg.ahh, i understand what you mean :) emulation station is 'dumb' in this regard because it just looks at the .zip name and then cross references it with a list of full games, and displays the title. BUT the underlying mame emulator, when launched, will take the .zip name as the game to load, and attempt to locate the relevant rom files of that game within that .zip, and either succeeds or fails. in this manner it can run all variants of a game in a merged .zip.
so contrary to what i said before, there is no need for underlying mame emulator to present the user with a menu to choose what variant from the merged .zip you are loading - it just loads whatever one the name is for. if you want to load something other than the parent/normal, you just rename :)
-
@dankcushions said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
so contrary to what i said before, there is no need for underlying mame emulator to present the user with a menu to choose what variant from the merged .zip you are loading - it just loads whatever one the name is for. if you want to load something other than the parent/normal, you just rename :)
Exactly! The one thing I am not quite sure on is who (front-end or emulator) contains the parent/clone relationship information to use a merged set.
I know the current versions of MAME have approximately twice as many clones/variants as it does parents so it could be useful when using a merged set especially for different regions that want to play the game as remembered.
-
@Riverstorm said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
@dankcushions said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
so contrary to what i said before, there is no need for underlying mame emulator to present the user with a menu to choose what variant from the merged .zip you are loading - it just loads whatever one the name is for. if you want to load something other than the parent/normal, you just rename :)
Exactly! The one thing I am not quite sure on is who (front-end or emulator) contains the parent/clone relationship information to use a merged set.
emulator i guess. all emulationstation does is pass run a command line which is basically (for a libretro emulator):
/some/dir/retroarch -L /some/dir/libretro-core.so /roms/mame/gamename.zip
so the emulator works out what it is trying to run from the game name, and then looks for the individual files within that. so if you had this game:
game1.zip: game1.rom game2.rom commonfile.rom
if you call it game1.zip, mame would look for game1.rom, and commonfile.rom (and find them), and if you rename it to game2.zip, it would look for game2.rom, and commonfile.rom (and find them). that is basically my understanding of merged sets :)
-
@dankcushions said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
if you call it game1.zip, mame would look for game1.rom, and commonfile.rom (and find them), and if you rename it to game2.zip, it would look for game2.rom, and commonfile.rom (and find them). that is basically my understanding of merged sets :)
I agree completely but by renaming the archive you're basically using a non-merged or split set parent with extra files.
We know in non-merged and split sets that all archive names exist as an actual folder file entry so it's pretty straight forward.
With merged it's not quite the same. The DAT files are created from the mame.exe file in each version. That means the DAT has all the information on interdependence between the parent and clones for a merged set.
Is MAME aware of merged sets. When I look at the command line I don't see any way to run say dkong3j.zip from dkong3.zip. Dkong3.zip has all the dkong3j.zip ROM files in it's archive but I don't see command line parameters. A hypothetical example:
mame.exe dkong3.zip dkong3j.zip
where you might specify the parent and then the clone to run. MAME is aware of the children but I don't see the options to work with them.That's why I was asking is the front-end delving into the archives to verify all the clones and creating lists and archives for clones on the fly which doesn't seem likely. A front-end is more like an extension of the emulator passing the command line parameters by checking boxes here and there in a GUI and sprucing up the looks. The other possibility is the emulator is handling it.
I mean to cross reference a list by hand and rename an archive to the correct clone almost seems silly as they are such short archaic names from the 8.3 filename era and difficult to remember. That's why I keep thinking there must be some way to run any game from a merged set with the correct command line parameters without renaming it every time. Some clones like Gauntlet you might have a dozen versions.
If not then it's just a nice way to save a bit of space. With a big drawback of dropping out to a command prompt to rename your archive when you want to try an alternate version. If that's the case a split set would be more appropriate.
-
Is MAME aware of merged sets. When I look at the command line I don't see any way to run say dkong3j.zip from dkong3.zip. Dkong3.zip has all the dkong3j.zip ROM files in it's archive but I don't see command line parameters. A hypothetical example: mame.exe dkong3.zip dkong3j.zip where you might specify the parent and then the clone to run. MAME is aware of the children but I don't see the options to work with them.
That's why I was asking is the front-end delving into the archives to verify all the clones which doesn't seem likely. A front-end is more like an extension of the emulator passing the command line parameters by checking boxes here and there in a GUI and sprucing up the looks of it. The other possibility is the emulator is handling it.Currently, no, emulationstation has absolutely no idea what it's running. All the fancy mame names are derived from a simple cross reference, I believe, purely based on the zip name. this is why we get lots of users complaining that ES shows the mame games in its gamelist, but they still don't work. well, es is happy as long as the filename is right.. the actual contents of the files is mame's problem :)
we're dealing in hypotheticals here, really. mame might have ways of handling loading sets via command line (i can't find any), but you also need our forks of mame (advmame, lr-mame*) to pass the same commands, and the frontend/runcommand to provide an interface to let the user choose. right now you're stuck with renaming.
-
All the fancy mame names are derived from a simple cross reference
Can I ask how this works a little more? Genuinely trying to get my head around it! -
@dankcushions said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
we're dealing in hypotheticals here, really. mame might have ways of handling loading sets via command line (i can't find any), but you also need our forks of mame (advmame, lr-mame*) to pass the same commands, and the frontend/runcommand to provide an interface to let the user choose. right now you're stuck with renaming.
Good point but most MAME forks have the same core functionality plus whatever "extra" features they want to add. I would imagine if it works in MAME then all the forks would port the code over too.
I was more curious rather than a wanted feature. I've been using MAME since the first year of it's release and I've never used merged sets except for quick and dirty testing. I basically stick to non-merge or split. They just come with the territory when doing ROM management.
After typing it all out it's really a straight forward question that maybe I can post on a MAME forum to get a better understanding of their purpose and how to use them. Usually they have good creative reasons for what they had in mind or where trying to accomplish, usually! ;)
-
@chavatar PS Ignore the formatting, and don't dumb it down ;)
-
I don't know if this helps or hurts the discussion, but for those of us who would rather manage a subset of ROMs on our systems (saves space, cleaner--no clones), I have always just generated non-merged archives as needed.
For example, I typically play Joust (Solid, Red Label). This is, of course, a specific clone. From a split set, you can't play joustr.zip unless you also have joust.zip (parent). But I don't want both of these in my menu. Solution: simply create a non-merged archive by unzipping both and copying the files from joust.zip into joustr.zip. Re-zip. Delete the parent. Done. Now, ES sees only Joust (Solid Red Label) and when launched, MAME finds the parent ROMs inside too.
If you have a merged archive (joust.zip with ALL clone components) You don't have to stop and rename it when you want to play a clone--just make a copy and give each copy the name of the clone/parent that you want to play and they will both be in the ES menu.
-
I think the points in my example have already been made, but even if MAME could launch a specific clone based on command line params, it wouldn't matter because you still need to represent the specific clones to ES which builds the menu based on the ROMs it finds. In other words, you'd have to drop an archaically-named file into the ROMs folder anyway, so it might as well be an actual ROM with the merged parts inside.
-
@dankcushions said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
right now you're stuck with renaming.
It does indeed work. I just finished building a 0.78 set (lr-mame2003) and merged dkong3.zip, dkong3j.zip and dkong3b.zip into one archive. When using -verifyroms switch it does indeed see 3 working versions.
C:\Temp\MAME\mame078b>mame -verifyroms dkong3b : dk3b-c.1d 512 bytes ROM NEEDS REDUMP dkong3b : dk3b-c.1c 512 bytes ROM NEEDS REDUMP dkong3b : dk3b-v.2n 256 bytes ROM NEEDS REDUMP romset dkong3b [dkong3] is best available 3 romsets found, 3 were OK.
All 3 games run fine. The US and Japan version work with no issues. The bootleg on Donkey Kong Jr. hardware complains of needed ROM redumps but does run with improper colors from the Donkey Jr. color pallete (this has nothing to do with what we were trying to test but the bootleg hardware it runs on).
The only file present in the ROMs folder is the parent dkong3.zip but when I run
mame dkong3j
ormame dkong3b
they work like a champ.With that information we know MAME is aware and can use all variants of the parent without the "physical" file being present. Now it's just a question of populating the game directory list (not necessarily with files) as it knows to look to the parent automatically when the proper clone/child name is passed.
It could cut down on directory entries if you use a lot of variants by combining a parent and maybe a clone or regional version you might like to play.
-
@Riverstorm said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
The only file present in the ROMs folder is the parent dkong3.zip but when I run
mame dkong3j
ormame dkong3b
they work like a champ.That's actually a great test and good to know it works that way. To take advantage of the simplified directory, you now need a way to edit the menu list displayed in ES, and I think this is where practicality will win in the end. It's going to be easier in the long run to "manage" the menu by way of the files present in the ROM folder.
-
@Riverstorm said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
@dankcushions said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
right now you're stuck with renaming.
It does indeed work. I just finished building a 0.78 set (lr-mame2003) and merged dkong3.zip, dkong3j.zip and dkong3b.zip into one archive. When using -verifyroms switch it does indeed see 3 working versions.
C:\Temp\MAME\mame078b>mame -verifyroms dkong3b : dk3b-c.1d 512 bytes ROM NEEDS REDUMP dkong3b : dk3b-c.1c 512 bytes ROM NEEDS REDUMP dkong3b : dk3b-v.2n 256 bytes ROM NEEDS REDUMP romset dkong3b [dkong3] is best available 3 romsets found, 3 were OK.
All 3 games run fine. The US and Japan version work with no issues. The bootleg on Donkey Kong Jr. hardware complains of needed ROM redumps but does run with improper colors from the Donkey Jr. color pallete (this has nothing to do with what we were trying to test but the bootleg hardware it runs on).
The only file present in the ROMs folder is the parent dkong3.zip but when I run
mame dkong3j
ormame dkong3b
they work like a champ.With that information we know MAME is aware and can use all variants of the parent without the "physical" file being present. Now it's just a question of populating the game directory list (not necessarily with files) as it knows to look to the parent automatically when the proper clone/child name is passed.
no, we know that mame current can cope, but with retropie we're using 10+ year old versions of mame, and forks of them to boot, with their own command line interfaces. so you're stuck with renaming in retropie :)
-
@caver01 said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
In other words, you'd have to drop an archaically-named file into the ROMs folder anyway, so it might as well be an actual ROM with the merged parts inside.
I suppose you could store all the files in the parent and have a empty file for the variant but gosh it seems like all the pieces are there it's just getting the front-end in the know.
I pretty much always use non-merged as some the "main" versions from our region are clones. That way I don't have to pull in extra versions with a split set. I am sure the MAME devs have a method to how they designate the master/parent.
-
@dankcushions said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
no, we know that mame current can cope, but with retropie we're using 10+ year old versions of mame, and forks of them to boot, with their own command line interfaces. so you're stuck with renaming in retropie :)
That's why I posted the version (0.78) which is 13 years old and it works fine. It's not the emulator that needs tweaking it would be the front-end as the functionality is already in place and has been for well over 10 years. I'm not saying ES will have it anytime soon or ever. I was just pointing out that it does work after doing some testing.
-
@Riverstorm but that's still not what we're using. we're using LR-mame2003, which does not use that command line interface. libretro/retroarch is its own interface.
-
@chavatar said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
@dankcushions
All the fancy mame names are derived from a simple cross reference
Can I ask how this works a little more? Genuinely trying to get my head around it!here's the cross reference in the code - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Aloshi/EmulationStation/master/es-app/src/MameNameMap.cpp
-
@dankcushions said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
@Riverstorm but that's still not what we're using. we're using LR-mame2003, which does not use that command line interface. libretro/retroarch is it's own interface.
Retroarch is a front-end that interfaces with the Libertro API. I would assume it's safe to say they are using the source files from 2003 that already had that functionality built in. They did not rewrite the emulator from scratch. You can find every version of the open source files over at mamedev.org. As you said:
all emulationstation does is pass run a command line which is basically (for a libretro emulator):
/some/dir/retroarch -L /some/dir/libretro-core.so /roms/mame/gamename.zipI am not sure why you feel a need to flex. I thought we had a nice discovery of knowing merged sets work fine on these old versions. I would bet on forks like AdvMAME it would work too. Possibly in the future the devs could tweak the front-end utilizing that knowledge if they wanted. I am not in a contest with you about who knows more. I was trying to further/improve the cause and let the devs decide what they may or may not do in the future. It was simply a discovery that we didn't know about yesterday. As Herb says anything is possible it's just currently not a feature.
You said:
we know that mame current can cope, but with retropie we're using 10+ year old versions of mame.
You do know that each version of MAME is separate and written from the year of release hence lr-mame2003 is 13 years old and probably uses the 0.78 code with some tweaks then compiled? As lr-mame2010 is 5 years old, etc. I was using old binaries for testing so yes I do know it's 10+ years old and it worked!
-
@Riverstorm said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
@dankcushions said in Which system emlator should I use? I only want to play "Space Invaders":
@Riverstorm but that's still not what we're using. we're using LR-mame2003, which does not use that command line interface. libretro/retroarch is it's own interface.
Retroarch is a front-end that interfaces with the Libertro API.
that's why i asked what you meant by 'frontend' in this situation :) you said emulationstation.. well, now it's retroarch? :)
I would assume it's safe to say they are using the source files from 2003 that already had that functionality built in. They did not rewrite the emulator from scratch. You can find every version of the open source files over at mamedev.org. As you said:
all emulationstation does is pass run a command line which is basically (for a libretro emulator):
/some/dir/retroarch -L /some/dir/libretro-core.so /roms/mame/gamename.zipright, but by implementing it in libretro you abstract all that stuff away - there are NO mame-related command line functions used in libretro mame cores. any functionality previously accessed via command line has to be mapped to a retroarch core option, which is sometimes trivial if it's an on/off function, but this isn't that sort of scenario. it could be done, of course, but i don't see anyone proposing to code it :)
I am not sure why you feel a need to flex. I thought we had a nice discovery of knowing merged sets work fine on these old versions. I would bet on forks like AdvMAME it would work too. Possibly in the future the devs could tweak the front-end utilizing that knowledge if they wanted. I am not in a contest with you about who knows more. I was trying to further/improve the cause and let the devs decide what they may or may not do in the future. It was simply a discovery that we didn't know about yesterday. As Herb says anything is possible it's just currently not a feature.
i'm not flexing! i'm not saying it couldn't work at all! i was just saying that you couldn't achieve this with emulationstation changes, which is why i specifically asked what you meant by 'frontend' before i dismissed this idea :)
You said:
we know that mame current can cope, but with retropie we're using 10+ year old versions of mame.
You do know that each version of MAME is separate and written from the year of release hence lr-mame2003 is 13 years old and probably uses the 0.78 code with some tweaks then compiled? As lr-mame2010 is 5 years old, etc. I was using old binaries for testing so yes I do know it's 10+ years old and it worked!
yeah, you've already told me you were using an old version of mame.. great! it still doesn't make much of a difference :)
ideas are cool! i don't want to be negative, i'm just trying to manage expectations :)
-
@dankcushions Thanks. Ok, sorry, but I'm looking at my 8.3 convention 0.37b5 romset. I can see sselph's scraper picking up different things (versions more than games), if at all...
I'm a real mame noob and ran into this problem with Alex Kidd - see here [http://www.gamesdbase.com/mame-rom/alexkidd1.aspx] - look at the naming history. What am I missing? How to you keep track of that moving target?
Contributions to the project are always appreciated, so if you would like to support us with a donation you can do so here.
Hosting provided by Mythic-Beasts. See the Hosting Information page for more information.