ROMS to be downloaded on the RetroPi OS

BenMcLean

For example, PDRoms is a site dedicated to reporting about ROMs that are, "Freeware, Donation Ware, Open Source, Public Domain or has otherwise been legalized for free use by their respective owners."

mediamogul

@BenMcLean

All very true, but it was pretty clear that the OP was suggesting illegal ROM packs. He was also promoting illegal ROM sites within a few minutes of his post here that same day and was warned against it. Personally, I'm not a big fan of downloadable public domain ROM packs either. There are already several easy ways to add ROMs to RetroPie and PD games can just as easily be added using any of those methods.

meleu

@BenMcLean the current methods are pretty simple. Maybe it's enough...

By the way, I didn't know that site. Thanks for sharing. ;-)

mediamogul

PD ROM sites are often in violation of IP infringement themselves without really knowing. A good example from the site above is the Future Drivers release of 'Fix-t Felix Jr.', which makes use of the trademarked characters of Disney's 'Wreck-it Ralph', making it impossible to be in the public domain. I think that sometimes these sites actually do know better and are just using the idea of public domain as a distraction, much like is often seen with the legally non-existent software classification of "abandonware".

herb_fargus

@mediamogul playing the devils advocated, you could technically make the same argument for any of the logos in ES and all the metadata that is scraped as well.

Fact is, if any of these companies had any issue realistic or not, we will shut down. no questions asked. and as it is I am honestly surprised we are still around.

mediamogul

@herb_fargus

playing the devils advocated, you could technically make the same argument for any of the logos in ES

You could definitely make that argument. @ChoccyHobNob learned that first hand when the people from intellivisionlives contacted him about the unlicensed use of the Intellivision logo on his case skins. Uniquely stylized fonts and generic images are probably the only real solution and the metadata is questionable fair use, but as mentioned earlier, it doesn't really matter if your not prepared to be tied up in court for years to fight it.

Personally, since there's no commercial use here, I don't think it's worth stressing over the logos, in the same way I don't think it's worth the RetroArch guys worrying about character trademark infringement for the 'Game & Watch' simulations. However, I'm sure that anyone who's aware of the consequences would agree that we should at least make every effort not to associate RetroPie with software piracy wherever possible.

BuZz

@BenMcLean Not sure what your motivation is, but you are not being helpful. Also replying to me on twitter with this - https://twitter.com/RetroPieProject/status/866083499656310784 - no need to stick your oar in there to try and confuse matters.

They are not selling their own software - they are including thousands of commercial/ copyrighted games.

There is no-one I know of just selling RetroPie images with legal roms - also you cannot sell the RetroPie image anyway. It's pretty obvious what this thread is about too.

BenMcLean

My point is that just saying "selling ROMs is illegal" isn't true. This is important because I want to encourage more companies to sell or officially release ROMs of their old games they developed.

BuZz

@BenMcLean We are aware it's ok for people to sell their own work. However the problem we have isn't that. It's people selling/distributing RetroPie with thousands of other people's copyrighted games. It's going to be rather annoying if you plan on "clarifying" your point every time this comes up (And it won't have the effect you want ).

BenMcLean

@BuZz said in ROMS to be downloaded on the RetroPi OS:

However the problem we have isn't that. It's people selling/distributing RetroPie with thousands of other people's copyrighted games.

Many popular open source emulator have this problem.

It's going to be rather annoying if you plan on "clarifying" your point every time this comes up (And it won't have the effect you want ).

I'm saying you need to be very clear that selling ROMs isn't inherently illegal when you talk about this. These companies know what they're doing is illegal and usually wrong as well but public perception on the legality of ROMs and emulators in general matters. Nintendo in particular has been spreading misinformation about this for decades because they want more control over the future of technology to belong to megacorporations like them and to change the law to make projects like RetroArch actually illegal. Just saying "selling ROMs is illegal" normalizes this impression which would make passing laws to that effect much much easier for them.

I think if RetroPie was to distribute a facility to download ROMs that are legally in the clear, this might help dispel the misconception that sharing ROM files is inherently illegal.