ES devs and testers, this tool is for you!
-
@lilbud please, try to get from this URL and try again: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/meleu/rp-testers/master/es-tests.sh
from command line:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/meleu/rp-testers/master/es-tests.sh chmod a+x es-tests.sh
-
@meleu said in ES devs and testers, this tool is for you!:
New version released: epsilon
Update the script using the Update feature at the Main Menu.
Changelog
- Added an option to load the repo/branch list from the open Pull Requests in RetroPie's EmulationStation repository (thanks @Hex for the insight!).
The Message ("List of...") should also add that some entries are from currently submitted PRs
-
@Hex sorry, I didn't get what you mean. It says "... branches list from open PRs in RetroPie repo", isn't it enough?
-
I need to test this out rather than post messages when i am sleepy. Sorry for the confusion.
-
@Hex No problem. I'm really happy with this feature, I'm constantly looking for an excuse to use it! :D
Thanks for bringing it up.
-
This post is deleted! -
@meleu, I would suggest manual download of jq if apt-get is not found
-
@Hex Do you mean that the script shouldn't provide this facility when it detects the absence of
jq
package?
-
"Do you want to install"... triggers
apt-get
. I use fedora which usesdnf
so the command to install fails.I would like the script to check if apt-get is present else is dnf present and then use that accordantly. If both fail you can get the executable from github (optional)
jq 1.5 is in the official Debian and Ubuntu repositories. Install using
sudo apt-get install jq
.jq 1.5 is in the official Fedora repository. Install using
sudo dnf install jq
.jq 1.4 is in the official openSUSE repository. Install using
sudo zypper install jq
.jq 1.5 is in the official Arch repository. Install using
sudo pacman -Sy jq
. -
@Hex Well, it's intended to be used on a Debian-based distro (just like RetroPie is). But I'll add a warning if apt-get is not found.
-
@Hex Done. If the script can't find
apt-get
, the user will see this dialog:
-
Feature request: Build and install based on a current PR number.
Rationale: lower the barrier even more: users do not need to hunt for the correct repo + branch, if they only know the GitHub PR number. -
@zigurana got it. I'll try to implement it this weekend. ;)
-
Woaw excellent, i didn't see this ES test project before, i love it, so easy and fast to test branch :)
Thanks a lot to make it... -
@zigurana said in ES devs and testers, this tool is for you!:
Feature request: Build and install based on a current PR number.
Rationale: lower the barrier even more: users do not need to hunt for the correct repo + branch, if they only know the GitHub PR number.What do you think if we use the PR number rather than a sequential number in the menus? Is it enough?
Like this:
-
Wow! That was fast! Man, you are ever dependable!
I love it!
I think the PR number is clear enough to understand, no need to re-number them in the script.Will this exist alongside the current method of manually specifying a repository and branch? That would be usefull for things that are not yet PRs.
[EDIT:]
Oh wow, I am an ass. I just now see that you already had the function to get the current list of open PRs! Since June! Never mind me, I should have actually updated the tool, I guess. </shameface>In any case, this new improvement is a bit of cosmetics that will not hurt anyone. At least now it's absolutely clear what PR folks are installing.
So cool of you to jump on this so quickly! Thanks!
-
@meleu said
Now look at this menu:
Yes thanks i forgot this, i can come back to the master branch.
Is there a way to compile MASTER branch with your script, it is faster than in Retropie-Setup because you are not removing sources files. I have think to add the GIT of the master branch to compile it like a beta, but maybe you already code something for it ? -
@darknior said in ES devs and testers, this tool is for you!:
Is there a way to compile MASTER branch with your script, it is faster than in Retropie-Setup because you are not removing sources files. I have think to add the GIT of the master branch to compile it like a beta, but maybe you already code something for it ?
Maybe I can take a look at it later. Quite busy currently.
Thanks for the feedback! ;-)
-
@meleu Option to compile "master" and "stable". Master is currently a dev branch.
-
@hex There are some "master" branch, but i don't see the official.
Only eagleOwl n Joemommasfat. But i think i can add it like any branch ?
Contributions to the project are always appreciated, so if you would like to support us with a donation you can do so here.
Hosting provided by Mythic-Beasts. See the Hosting Information page for more information.