@lurker
I do not listen to a book I have visually read because the narrator will never fit my inner voice.
I know exactly what you're talking about. The one time I tried this was with 'Ready Player One'. Whenever I commit to reading a book, I generally like it to be something new, but I wanted to revisit RP1 not long after I read it the first time. I thought the audio book would be a good way to do that, but while I have nothing against Wil Wheaton, I had real difficulties accepting him speaking for the characters in a different way than I perceived them. I finished it out, but I wouldn't do it again.
I thought it 'meh' anywhere.
That's perfectly fair. Interestingly enough, the original story that would become 'Dracula' was actually written on the same rainy night as the story that would become 'Frankenstein' as a parlor game to see who could write the best scary story. Even then, the three participants agreed that 'Frankenstein' was the more compelling tale. In an even greater coincidence, the third story went on to become the plot for 'The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants 2'.
Not to give up on the classics I think I will try H.G. Wells "The Invisible Man" next.
Oh man, what a great choice. I was just thinking the other day that I should read 'The Time Machine' again. I haven't read it since high school.
@Riverstorm
In your thoughts everything is precisely as you perceive it. Hearing others perception is the fun and interesting part.
Well said also. I definitely agree.